I recently offered a job candidate a position where he could work about twenty minutes from his house rather than the hour and half he was commuting currently. The daily work was similar as his current job and I was able to offer him $65,000 per year which was a significant increase from his current pay. Unfortunately for me, he did not take our job offer because once his current employer found he had a new job with us they offered him $74,000 to retain him at his current position!
Our rural area does not pay in same range as jobs closer to the city, so I was not able to increase my offer. Looking at this it seemed like an easy choice, right? They were offering him $9,000 more per year – of course he should take their offer!
But wait… was their offer really better?
If you look at the time spent from the time he left his house to the time he returned it wasn’t so simple.
|Salary||Hours on the Job||Hours Commuting||Total Hours||Hours Per Year||Hourly Wage|
Even though he would receive $9,000 per year more in salary, his hourly wage including commuting was $3 less with their offer! This doesn’t even include the cost of wear and tear on his car, parking, gas costs, and meals out because he wouldn’t have the time to prepare meals at home.
The IRS currently estimates the cost of driving including gas and wear and tear on a vehicle to be .535/mile. His commute would be 25 miles one way with our offer and 60 miles one way with theirs. Or in dollars and cents…. $26.75 with our offer and $64.20 per day with their offer. ($6,687.50 compared to $16,050 per year assuming he works 50 weeks per year.)
Driving to the city rather than our small town will add $10 per day in parking as well … or $2,500 per year.
And lastly, because he will be commuting such long distances we can assume he will be eating out a bit more as a family. Being conservative, let’s assume they eat out one more time per week than they would normally and they eat at a fast food joint rather than a place with tablecloths. For a family of four getting two adult meals and two kids meals that would come to $22 per meal or over year $1,144.
I’m being conservative also in assuming that the additional commute time won’t cost more in daycare costs.
So let’s add this up….
- $9,362.50 in additional driving costs
- $2,500 in additional parking costs
- $1,144 in additional meal costs
This is a total of $13,006.50 per year in additional costs! Granted he will make $9,000 more per year in salary (although its $3 less per hour once you add commuting time) so in the end he will make $4,006.50 after the costs of commuting.
A recent article Bloomberg.com ranked Charles County, MD as the highest cost of commuting in the ENTIRE country and estimated the cost at $14,612 … not too far off from my estimate of $13,006.50. Link to Bloomberg Article
That’s just the monetary difference. There is also the toll it pays on your family. If you have kids, you won’t see them as much. You aren’t there to coach their teams, attend their events or help with homework. A Swedish study even found that couples with commutes of 45 minutes or more divorced at a rate 40% higher than those with shorter commutes!
So less pay, increased chances of divorce, obesity and other health issues, and less time with your family all can be contributed to that longer commute. Seems like the choice is easy – work local!
This post was written by:
Zekiah Board of Directors
For more information on this post e-mail us at firstname.lastname@example.org.